February 13, 2008; Page A26
The ink is still moist on Capitol Hill's latest energy bill and, as if on cue, a scientific avalanche is demolishing its assumptions. To wit, trendy climate-change policies like ethanol and other biofuels are actually worse for the environment than fossil fuels. Then again, Washington's energy neuroses are more political than practical, so it's easy for the Solons and greens to ignore what would usually be called evidence.
The Wall Street Journal
Is this bill going to save our energy? What do you think should be done to solve your Greenhouse Affect or is it not a problem?
4 comments:
They should be no acolohole in school and streets. It can affect people and they can die if you have acolohole in your house.
No I think we talk too much about we are going to do. We have had numerous bills and policies over the years but few of them seem to help. They are too political and lack real goals and consequences. We need to have a real leader of a politician that knows what he is talking about when it comes to the enviroment to set down the law and what we will do to help the problem.
I don't think it will save energy. All people do is talk about how they want to solve problems, but never really get anything done. We, as a country, can't offset global warming on our own. It's a global problem and should be adressed as such.
I don't think that it will save a lot of evergy. I think this is a global problem. I think for the problem to get solved, someone needs to step up to the plate.
Post a Comment